tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post7817330904190722598..comments2023-06-16T12:05:47.873-04:00Comments on Gunnar Hillert's Blog: Apache Camel AlternativesGunnar Hillerthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12757936011493339624noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-4823311935089631192016-03-21T03:29:42.981-04:002016-03-21T03:29:42.981-04:00Nice blog !! but I have got one doubt that how can...Nice blog !! but I have got one doubt that how can we compare drools and JESS in the other areas. Please explain regarding that. Other part you did an excellent job and also given the amazing explanation regarding Spring integration. mule esb enterprisehttp://www.whishworks.com/blog/api/dockerizing-mulesoft-esb/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-3809671450072240832015-05-29T11:42:46.003-04:002015-05-29T11:42:46.003-04:00I don't think you can compare Camel to any BPM...I don't think you can compare Camel to any BPM framework, or even an ESB. Apache Camel is an integration framework, so, you can only compare it to frameworks like it, such as Spring Framework. MuleESB is far different from Camel or any integration frameworks. Also, I don't need to say about jBPM or any other BPM framework. By the way, you can use Camel along with a BPM framework, like jBPM or Activiti, that makes more sense than compare several technologies with very different focuses.Gabrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09979912797466911558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-35699945980436001132014-02-04T09:28:40.000-05:002014-02-04T09:28:40.000-05:00I understand that Drools is Open Source and JESS i...I understand that Drools is Open Source and JESS is not, but how do they compare in other areas like ease of use, performance, level of integration with your code?David Wilsonhttp://thefas-solutions.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-66990058314848538002013-10-07T08:30:43.844-04:002013-10-07T08:30:43.844-04:00HI Gunnar,
Could you please explain me , about wh...HI Gunnar,<br /><br />Could you please explain me , about which ESB based on which,<br /><br />means wso2esb based on apache esb..<br />like, mule,fuse,jboss,opensource esb based on which...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-56944106327015494752012-01-11T04:07:33.721-05:002012-01-11T04:07:33.721-05:00I just wrote an article, which explains my experie...I just wrote an article, which explains my experiences with Apache Camel and its alternatives Spring Integration and Mule ESB: <br /><br /><a href="http://www.kai-waehner.de/blog/2012/01/10/spoilt-for-choice-which-integration-framework-to-use-spring-integration-mule-esb-or-apache-camel" rel="nofollow">Spoilt for Choice: Which Integration Framework to use – Spring Integration, Mule ESB or Apache Camel?</a><br /><br />Best regards,<br />Kai Wähner (Twitter: @KaiWaehner)Kai Wähnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17068174875342008383noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-74637455116536319002009-11-04T03:36:55.229-05:002009-11-04T03:36:55.229-05:00I was told by a reviewer for my book - Camel in Ac...I was told by a reviewer for my book - Camel in Action that there is another integration project called Open Adaptor - https://www.openadaptor.org/Claus Ibsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17434564836989249540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-80277576391901133322009-10-20T04:01:38.988-04:002009-10-20T04:01:38.988-04:00"To me a good argument for Apache Camel was (..."To me a good argument for Apache Camel was (...) its adoption by other frameworks such as ActiveMQ and ServiceMix."<br /><br />While I agree Apache Camel is great, I don't think that is a very good argument, since Camel, ActiveMQ and ServiceMix are all backed by the same company: FUSE.<br /><br />http://fusesource.com/breunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11076354498835513366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-72060045516477238762009-10-19T01:25:22.676-04:002009-10-19T01:25:22.676-04:00Hi Mark,
Thanks for your clarifications! I highly...Hi Mark,<br /><br />Thanks for your clarifications! I highly appreciate it. As time permits I plan on taking a closer look at Spring Integration. As I do my explorations basically in my spare time, I haven't had the time, just yet.Gunnar Hillerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12757936011493339624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-15921337083113892972009-10-19T01:17:19.218-04:002009-10-19T01:17:19.218-04:00Hi Anton,
Thanks for the comment.
Smooks (http://...Hi Anton,<br /><br />Thanks for the comment.<br />Smooks (http://www.smooks.org) looks interesting but I always regarded it more as a transformation component, although it seems to have some routing capabilities (Need to look at it as time permits...).<br /><br />Camel actually provides a component that uses Smooks for parsing EDI data (http://camel.apache.org/smooks.html). <br /><br />Anyway, message transformation (Particular non-XML data e.g. EDI) always seemed a bit under-represented in the OSS world and Smooks appears to be the only serious contender.Gunnar Hillerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12757936011493339624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-81519343448093391522009-10-19T00:56:25.250-04:002009-10-19T00:56:25.250-04:00Thanks Claus for the feedback. Interestingly I hav...Thanks Claus for the feedback. Interestingly I have never heard of Apache Synapse but I added it to the list. Just doing a quick read about it, it sounds like it is somewhat between ServiceMix and Camel in terms of functionality.Gunnar Hillerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12757936011493339624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-65637249369601499602009-10-18T14:24:27.209-04:002009-10-18T14:24:27.209-04:00Nice posts Gunnar. It's good to see objective ...Nice posts Gunnar. It's good to see objective comparisons and the recognition that different frameworks may appeal to people and their projects for different reasons. It is true that Spring Integration doesn't have as many adapters, but the number of adapters has not been our focus, so I'll point out a couple things that do relate to our goals.<br /><br />I think one key difference between Spring Integration and Camel is in the programming model. I tend to view it as component-centric (SI) vs. route-centric (Camel) where "components" are the Message Channels and Message Endpoints themselves. Our goal has been to maintain a clean separation between code and configuration, while recognizing that some components belong in code (e.g. POJO services) and others belong in configuration (e.g. File poller).<br /><br />Another key difference is in the extent to which we build on the Spring Framework and collaborate with other Spring projects (Security, WS, Batch, DM, Spring/BlazeDS). One thing you may notice is that we're already supporting Spring 3 features, such as the new TaskScheduler abstraction and SpEL, in our 2.0 milestones.Mark Fisherhttp://www.springsource.org/spring-integrationnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-4597015882285856232009-10-18T04:35:10.412-04:002009-10-18T04:35:10.412-04:00Great list. I have added it to the Camel articles ...Great list. I have added it to the Camel articles web page so people can find it in the future.<br /><br />I guess Apache Synapse is also in the integration world.Claus Ibsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17434564836989249540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-67348237823913597932009-10-18T04:02:35.996-04:002009-10-18T04:02:35.996-04:00I would add smooks to the list. Smooks to JBossESB...I would add <a href="http://smooks.org" rel="nofollow">smooks</a> to the list. Smooks to JBossESB is the same as Camel to ServiceMix.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11951065633319406772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-46876398403964573712009-10-18T00:30:31.035-04:002009-10-18T00:30:31.035-04:00thanks for the informative blog post. it is indeed...thanks for the informative blog post. it is indeed hard to find a comparison like the one you posted. I wonder how Spring Integration 2 will stack up against Camel. BTW, Groovy + Camel is AWESOME.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15426972572330897720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-30284368234913028712009-10-17T23:36:25.901-04:002009-10-17T23:36:25.901-04:00Excelent post, congrats man. I think that Spring I...Excelent post, congrats man. I think that Spring Integration is several light years behind in documentation, components, Camel is stronger.<br /><br />Saludos desde la Ciudad de Méxicodomixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14441552794386736631noreply@blogger.com