tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post7427297979827901560..comments2023-06-16T12:05:47.873-04:00Comments on Gunnar Hillert's Blog: Migrating from JCL+Log4j to SLF4J+LogbackGunnar Hillerthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12757936011493339624noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-30349849506688170222009-03-06T03:26:00.000-05:002009-03-06T03:26:00.000-05:00That means log4j is still in your classpath somewh...That means log4j is still in your classpath somewhere and is being used in preference to the bridge. Prove this by doing a Class.forName on one of the classes in log4j but not in the bridge.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1699950446304666715.post-89571857967697686092009-02-23T19:59:00.001-05:002009-02-23T19:59:00.001-05:00Hi,I'm dealing with JAWR and Logback using by ...Hi,<BR/>I'm dealing with JAWR and Logback using by using the log4j-over-slf4j bridge as well but no success.<BR/><BR/>I can see in my log file that:<BR/>log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (net.jawr.web.servlet.JawrRequestHandler).<BR/><BR/>this is my logback.xml<BR/><appender class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender" name="STDOUTAppender"><BR/> <filter class="ch.qos.logback.classic.filter.ThresholdFilter"><BR/> <level>debug</level><BR/> </filter><BR/> <layout class="ch.qos.logback.classic.PatternLayout"><BR/> <pattern>%d{yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss},%p,%c, %t, %L, %ex, %M %m%n</pattern><BR/> </layout><BR/> </appender><BR/><logger name="net.jawr" additivity="false"><BR/> <level value="DEBUG"/><BR/> <appender-ref ref="STDOUTAppender" /><BR/> </logger><BR/><BR/>should I do anything else to do things work?<BR/><BR/>Any help would be much appreciated.The sweet summerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17252929594614293616noreply@blogger.com